JoSAA research · 2026 closing-rank evidence

JoSAA 2026 cutoff movement by round

AdmiScan analysed 57,031 usable JoSAA 2026 closing-rank rows across 5 rounds. Among 11,398 exact seat-pool combinations observed in at least two rounds, 8,113 finished at a higher closing rank than where they started.

57,031
usable cutoff rows
11,398
matched seat pools
71.2%
closed at a higher rank later
254
median rank movement

What changed across JoSAA rounds?

71.2% of exact matched seat pools had a numerically higher closing rank in their last observed round than in their first. 28.6% were unchanged and 0.2% finished at a lower closing rank.

The median first-to-last movement was 254ranks. The arithmetic average was 1,894.7ranks, which is higher because a small number of seat pools moved by much larger amounts.

This does not mean a student should automatically wait for a later round. JoSAA outcomes depend on the exact institute, program, quota, category, gender pool and applicable rank list.

JoSAA 2026 data coverage by round

RoundRowsInstitutesProgramsCategoriesClosing-rank range
Round 111,54781240101–14,97,038
Round 211,39681240101–14,97,038
Round 311,37781240101–14,97,038
Round 411,36581240101–14,97,038
Round 511,34681240101–14,97,038

Examples of large later-round movement

These are observed examples from exact 2026 seat pools. They are not predictions and should only be interpreted within the same rank-list semantics.

National Institute of Technology, Mizoram

Computer Science and Engineering (4 Years, Bachelor of Technology)

HS quota · OPEN · Female-only (including Supernumerary)

Closing rank moved from 5,52,840 to 9,36,083 — a difference of 3,83,243 ranks.

National Institute of Technology, Mizoram

Chemical Science and Technology (4 Years, Bachelor of Technology)

HS quota · OPEN · Gender-Neutral

Closing rank moved from 10,32,951 to 13,90,116 — a difference of 3,57,165 ranks.

National Institute of Technology Sikkim

Mechanical Engineering (4 Years, Bachelor of Technology)

HS quota · OPEN · Female-only (including Supernumerary)

Closing rank moved from 3,47,828 to 5,36,655 — a difference of 1,88,827 ranks.

How to use this in JoSAA choice filling

Historical movement can help you avoid deleting ambitious choices solely because an early-round cutoff looks out of reach. Keep aspirational options above realistic and safer choices when that is genuinely your preference order.

Never compare raw ranks across different categories or rank-list types as though they are one scale. Use the exact seat-pool context that applies to you.

Check your JoSAA choice list

Methodology and source coverage

The analysed dataset contains 57,031 usable JoSAA 2026 rows across 81 institutes, 240 academic programs, 6 quotas, 10 categories, 2 gender pools, 3 institute types and 3 rank-list types.

A comparison is made only when institute, academic program, quota, category, gender pool, institute type and rank-list type all match. This produced 11,398 combinations observed in at least two rounds, with zero duplicate round-key groups.

Source-URL coverage is 100%. The analysed rows map to the official JoSAA 2026 OR-CR source for Rounds 1–5. Historical cutoffs are evidence, not guarantees of a future allotment.

Related cutoff movement research

Compare how closing ranks moved in other counselling systems. Rank scales and seat-pool rules differ, so use each analysis within its own counselling context.